THE GMEAN (following) 2
You will find the copy of the optimalf.xls file of Gibbons below:
You will note that it is the practical application to a speculation on futures of the system.
The number of trades is the whole part of the division of the account by the necessary sum to stand on a trade.
This necessary sum for trader a contract is equal to the maximal loss (-6.54) * $625/-0.36 = 11 354.17.
All these data permit to calculate the picture:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Num |
Trades |
HPRs |
#Units |
Acct. Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(points) |
|
Traded |
100 000 |
|
Current f |
f |
0,36 |
|
1 |
9,15 |
1,50 |
8 |
145 750 |
|
Starting Acount Equity |
Start |
$100 000 |
|
2 |
5,90 |
1,32 |
12 |
190 000 |
|
Dollars per whole dawns per unites |
Dollars |
$625 |
|
3 |
1,20 |
1,07 |
16 |
202 000 |
|
Largest losing trade (points) |
MaxLoss |
-6,54 |
|
4 |
-4,20 |
0,77 |
17 |
157 375 |
|
Equity required per unites traded |
EPU |
$11 354,17 |
|
5 |
-5,05 |
0,72 |
13 |
116 344 |
|
Terminal Wealth Relative |
TWR |
7,1482 |
|
6 |
-3,70 |
0,80 |
10 |
93 219 |
|
Number of trades |
Num.Trades |
49 |
|
7 |
0,65 |
1,04 |
8 |
96 469 |
|
Geometric mean |
GMEAN |
1,0410 |
|
8 |
2,10 |
1,12 |
8 |
106 969 |
|
Geometric average trade |
GAT |
$465,03 |
|
9 |
-1,45 |
0,92 |
9 |
98 813 |
|
Ending equity trading at f current |
EGAIN |
$658 256 |
|
10 |
15,80 |
1,87 |
8 |
177 813 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
4,20 |
1,23 |
15 |
217 188 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
8,55 |
1,47 |
19 |
318 719 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
-2,70 |
0,85 |
28 |
271 469 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
13,54 |
1,75 |
23 |
466 106 |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
-1,74 |
0,90 |
41 |
421 519 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
-2,12 |
0,88 |
37 |
372 494 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
14,92 |
1,82 |
32 |
670 894 |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
-2,88 |
0,84 |
59 |
564 694 |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
2,32 |
1,13 |
49 |
635 744 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
-3,16 |
0,83 |
55 |
527 119 |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
-0,92 |
0,95 |
46 |
500 669 |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
-3,14 |
0,83 |
44 |
414 319 |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
11,68 |
1,64 |
36 |
677 119 |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
3,32 |
1,18 |
59 |
799 544 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
0,56 |
1,03 |
70 |
824 044 |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
-6,00 |
0,67 |
72 |
554 044 |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
1,08 |
1,06 |
48 |
586 444 |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
-5,84 |
0,68 |
51 |
400 294 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
-1,50 |
0,92 |
35 |
367 481 |
|
© Copyright 1994 |
|
|
30 |
6,08 |
1,33 |
32 |
489 081 |
|
|
by Gibbon Burke |
|
|
31 |
2,00 |
1,11 |
43 |
542 831 |
|
|
All rights reserved |
|
|
32 |
-4,58 |
0,75 |
47 |
408 294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
2,98 |
1,16 |
35 |
473 481 |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
-0,64 |
0,96 |
41 |
457 081 |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
4,22 |
1,23 |
40 |
562 581 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
21,06 |
2,16 |
49 |
1 207 544 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
-6,54 |
0,64 |
106 |
774 269 |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
-0,22 |
0,99 |
68 |
764 919 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
-3,06 |
0,83 |
67 |
636 781 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
-3,12 |
0,83 |
56 |
527 581 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
2,20 |
1,12 |
46 |
590 831 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
14,06 |
1,77 |
52 |
1 047 781 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
-2,16 |
0,88 |
92 |
923 581 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
3,44 |
1,19 |
81 |
1 097 731 |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
4,12 |
1,23 |
96 |
1 344 931 |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
-5,24 |
0,71 |
118 |
958 481 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
-2,96 |
0,84 |
84 |
803 081 |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
-0,86 |
0,95 |
70 |
765 456 |
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
-2,56 |
0,86 |
67 |
658 256 |
The right part of the Gibbon leaf reproduced: the optimal f, the corresponding gmean as well as the result of the speculation that in résulte:
f = 0.12 -> gmean = 1.02 -> total result of tradeses = 255 119
You will find some diagrams permitting to visualize these data.
Two points are to put in evidence:
1 - in relation to the axis of symmetry of the gmean,pour one same output, he/it is preferable to choose the optimal the weakest f.
2 - while observing the diagram here under, one realizes that the top of the graph is flattened very, and that one can arbitrate without too much a pity for an optimal slightly weaker f.
